We are updating this content, stay tuned! 


Dual Use in the HBP

Current and newly emerging insights and technologies arising from research in brain sciences increase capabilities to access, assess and affect thought, emotion and behaviour. While much of this research and development is directed towards clinical use, it also has applications in other settings, notably in the political, security, intelligence and military (PSIM) domains. This is often referred to in terms of "Dual Use". Many of these potential uses raise important social and ethical questions which demand the attention of all those involved in the research, administration, management and regulation of neuroscience research and related technological developments, including those in information and communication technologies (ICT) and robotics.

For this reason, the Ethics and Society Sub-Project of the Human Brain Project has developed an "Opinion on ‘Responsible Dual Use". Political, Security, Intelligence and Military Research of Concern in Neuroscience and Neurotechnology’.

In this Opinion, we suggest that we can increase our ability to identify which programmes and projects of research, development and innovation are ‘of concern’ by applying the framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) to distinguish between "responsible" and "irresponsible" systems of research and technological development. We therefore use the term "dual use research of concern" (DURC) to refer to neuroscience research and technological innovations, and brain inspired developments in information and communication technologies, for use in the political, security, intelligence and military domains, which are either directly of concern because of their potential for use in ways that threaten the peace, health, safety, security and well-being of citizens, or are undertaken without responsible regard to such potential uses.

To ensure ongoing attention to these issues, the Opinion proposes recommendations for the Human Brain Project, the European Union and the wider neuroscience and ICT community. The HBP Dual Use Working Group is implementing these recommendations in collaboration with Ethics Rapporteur Programme, HBP Education Programme, Data Governance Working Group and Researcher Awareness task.

Dual Use Opinion

Read the Opinion here

If you have any questions about dual use or misuse issues in the HBP, please contact the Chair and Co-chair of the Dual Use Working Group. Alternatively, you can submit your questions via the HBP Point of Registration of Ethical Concerns PORE.

HBP Dual Use Activities and Resources

The HBP has undertaken a broad range of activities to address dual use issues including:

Ethics experts have positively evaluated HBP dual use activities as "a first promising step in the direction of awareness-enhancing strategies" (Ienca et al 2018: 273).

HBP Dual Use Working Group

Inga Ulnicane, Chair

Manuel Guerrero, Co-Chair

Douglas Armstrong

Wim Vanduffer

Audrey Wolff

Felix Hoffstaedter

Shreyas Mysore Suryanarayana

Erika Borcel

Andrew Rowley

Björn Kindler

Francesca Cavallaro

Florent Gaillard

Laura Saxer, HBP Education

Judith Kathrein, HBP Education

This page was last updated on 18/02/2020.