Neuroethics and Philosophy
Welcome to the HBP's neuroethics and philosophy work package
Learn more about neuroethics and the mind.
Why neuroethics and philosophy in the HBP?
Neuroscientific research and emerging neurotechnologies afford several conceptual, social, ethical, and regulatory issues, from potential privacy threats to understanding consciousness and the meaning of human and personal identity. Neuroethics focuses on those issues.
The field can be understood as an interface between the empirical brain sciences, philosophy of mind, moral philosophy, ethics, psychology, and the social sciences. Philosophical reflection plays a key role in neuroethical reflection a) it contributes to a conceptual level of interpretation of the scientific evidence that allows for a legitimate connection between scientific evidence and philosophical concepts; b) it allows critical distance; and c) it stifles unrealistic expectations regarding neuroscientific advances.
Is neuroethics like bioethics?
Not necessarily. In our research, we have identified three main neuroethical approaches: “neurobioethics,” (which mirrors bioethics) applies ethical theory and reasoning to address the practical issues raised by brain research, its clinical applications, and communication; “empirical neuroethics” uses empirical data to inform theoretical (e.g. what is moral reasoning) and practical issues (e.g. who is really a moral agent), and “conceptual neuroethics” uses conceptual analysis to address topics such as how neuroscientific knowledge is constructed and why or how empirical knowledge of the brain can be relevant to philosophical, social, and ethical concerns.
The field of neuroscience itself already includes some type of conceptual examination. However, the kind of conceptual analysis provided by neuroethics and philosophy importantly complements neuroscience by focusing on issues such as how neuroscientific knowledge is constructed and why or how empirical knowledge of the brain can be relevant to philosophical, social, and ethical concerns.
Recent News & Events
Neuroethics and Philosophy in Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Human Brain Project. Read more...
Coma patients might feel pleasure and pain like the rest of us. Emerging evidence suggests the unconscious can experience many of the things that conscious people do. What does this mean for medical ethics and even how we perceive ourselves as humans?
Large-scale Brain Simulation and Disorders of Consciousness. Mapping Technical and Conceptual Issues. Farisco M, Kotaleski JH and Evers K (2018) Front. Psychol. 9:585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00585.
Our primary research areas
Disorders of Consciousness. Among other things, this line of inquiry aims at reviewing and conceptually analysing the recent development in the scientific explanations and descriptions of consciousness, particularly focusing on disorders of consciousness (DOCs) and exploring the potential and actual clinical applications of neuro-technology for diagnosing and assessing DOCs.
Unconsciousness: Resignation Syndrome (RS). This clinical condition affects psychologically traumatised children undergoing migration and is characterised by failure to respond even to painful stimuli leaving the patients seemingly unconscious. This line of research focuses on the sociocultural and neurophysiological factors underlying this disorder. The goal is to provide an analysis that merges contextual and neurobiological aspects in a brain model of culture-bound syndromes.
Human Identity. As neuroscience provides more knowledge of the structures and functions of the nervous system, it is expected that it will further our understanding of what makes us human and will promote the development and application of neuro-technologies to modify the brain. This might have a significant impact on human and personal identity. This research project seeks to provide an analysis of the relevant issues, starting with the notion of human identity, its meaning and value, and its relation to the debate on human nature, and to examine related theoretical and practical concerns.
Neuronal Epigenesis. The brain develops in a natural and cultural context that profoundly influences its functional architecture. Lived developmental trajectories, interactions, and social environments impact synaptic connectivity and contribute to the formation of patterns of neural activity. Synaptic epigenesis theories of cultural and social imprinting on our brain architecture suggest that it is thus possible to culturally influence our neural predispositions. This research project examines the relationships between genotype and brain phenotype: the paradox of non-linear evolution between genome and brain complexity; the selection of cultural circuits in the brain during development; and the genesis and epigenetic transmission of cultural imprints.
Dual Use. This research line focuses on the concept of dual use, with explicit emphasis upon both the definition of dual uses of brain science within the HBP and more broadly, the examination of the neuroethical, legal, and social issues arising in and from such research and its applications. Specific attention is given to dual uses of neuroscientific research for military, national security and warfare operations, and direct-to-consumer and do-it-yourself applications of brain research science for lifestyle optimisation that may pose risks to public safety.
Learn more about these topics at: http://www.crb.uu.se/research/neuroethics/
Centre for Research Ethics & CRB
Husargatan 3, BMC, entranc E-751 22 Uppsala
Website: www.crb.uu.se mail: email@example.com elephone:+46 18 471 61 97 / ax: +46 18 471 66 75
Neuroethics and Philosophy team
Work package and Subproject leader